RESOURCES

Thought leaders in information security, we conduct radical, world-changing research and deliver renowned presentations around the world.
Blogs | INSIGHTS | December 7, 2011

Automating Social Engineering: Part Three

  PHASE 2: Ruses   Once we have enough information about the employees and company in question, we can begin to make some sense of the information and start crafting our ruses. It is worth noting that this stage currently does not have a lot of since it does require a lot of human intuition and information processing. Certainly as we continue developing the tool we will be able to automate more and create some decision making systems capable of creating useful ruses, but for now a key factor of…

Matias Brutti
Blogs | INSIGHTS | November 8, 2011

Automating Social Engineering: Part Two

  As with any other type of penetration test, we need to gather information. The only difference here is that instead of looking for operating system types, software versions, and vulnerabilities, we’re searching for information about the company, their employees, their social networking presence, et cetera. Given that we’re performing an assessment from a corporate perspective, there are some limitations with regard to privacy and employees’ private life, but the truth is that real attackers won’t abide by such limitations. So, you should assume that any…

Matias Brutti
Blogs | INSIGHTS | November 1, 2011

Automating Social Engineering: Part One

since the original conceptualization of computer security, and perhaps even before, social engineering has been in existence. One could say that social engineering began when societies began, whether it was realized or not. It is now time to give some of this work to scripts and applications to make it a little more interesting… As the years passed in the computer security community, network penetration became more and more necessary, but computers were not the only thing getting compromised. Social engineering was part of the hacker subculture, but it was…

Matias Brutti
Blogs | INSIGHTS | October 3, 2011

Windows Vulnerability Paradox

For those who read just the first few lines, this is not a critical vulnerability. It is low impact but interesting, so keep reading.   This post describes the Windows vulnerability I showed during my Black Hat USA 2011 workshop “Easy and Quick Vulnerability Hunting in Windows”.   The Windows security update for Visual C++ 2005 SP1 Redistributable Package (MS11-025) is a security patch for a binary planting vulnerability. This kind of vulnerability occurs when someone opens or executes a file and this file (or the application used to…

Cesar Cerrudo
Blogs | INSIGHTS | October 3, 2011

Easy and Quick Vulnerability Hunting in Windows

I’m glad to start this new blog for IOA Labs by publishing the video demonstrations and updated slides of my Black Hat USA 2011 workshop. I hope you like it, please send me your feedback, questions, etc. We will continue posting cool materials from our researchers very soon, keep tuned!

Cesar Cerrudo
Blogs | INSIGHTS | March 20, 2011

Blackhat TPM Talk Follow-up

Since speaking at BlackHat DC 2009, there have been several inquiries in regards to the security of the SLE66PE series smartcard family. Here are some issues that should be pointed out: We have heard, “..it took 6 months to succeed..“ The reality is it took 4 months to tackle obsticles found in any <200nm device such as: Capitance/load of probe needles when chip is running.Powering the device inside the chamber of a FIB workstation.Level-shifting a 1.8v core voltage following what we learned in #1 above.Cutting out metal layers without creating electrical shorts.Other more…

Cesar Cerrudo
Blogs | INSIGHTS | August 9, 2010

Atmel ATMEGA2560 Analysis (Blackhat follow-up)

At this years Blackhat USA briefings, the ATMEGA2560 was shown as an example of an unsecure vs. secure device.  We have received a few requests for more information on this research so here it goes… The device did not even need to be stripped down because of designer lazyness back at Atmel HQ.  All we did was look for the metal plates we detailed back in our ATMEGA88 teardown last year and quickly deduced which outputs were the proper outputs in under 20 minutes. Atmel likes to cover the AVR…

Cesar Cerrudo
Blogs | INSIGHTS | August 7, 2010

Parallax Propeller P8X32A Quick Teardown

Parallax has a really neat 8 core 32 bit CPU called the ‘Propeller’.  It’s been out for a few years but it is gaining popularity.  There is no security with the device as it boots insecurely via a UART or I2C EEPROM.  None the less, we thought it was interesting to see an 8 core CPU decapsulated! One can clearly see 8 columns that appear almost symmetric (except in the middle region).  The upper 8 squares are each ‘cogs’ 512 * 32 SRAMs as described in the…

Cesar Cerrudo
Blogs | INSIGHTS | August 6, 2010

Echostar v NDS appellate court ruling update

Normally, I would not mix non-technical with the blog however I thought this deserved a little more attention that it has received. The ruling which states that NDS has won the lawsuit, vindicates myself and puts Echostar owing NDS almost 18,000,000.00 USD has come down as of 2 days ago. As well I thought it nice to mention that neither Flylogic nor myself works for/or with Echostar, Nagra, NDS or any other conditional access company in any way or form. I wish all persons whom this lawsuit  effects the best…

Christopher Tarnovsky
Blogs | INSIGHTS | February 14, 2010

Infineon / ST Mesh Comparison

Given all the recent exposure from our Infineon research, we have had numerous requests regarding the ST mesh architecture and how Infineon’s design compares to the ST implementation. Both devices are a 4 metal ~140 nanometer process.  Rather than have us tell you who we think is stronger (it’s pretty obvious), we’d like to see your comments on what you the readers think! The Infineon mesh consists of 5 zones with 4 circuits per zone.  This means the surface of the die is being covered by 20 different electrical circuits. The ST mesh…

IOActive

Commonalities in Vehicle Vulnerabilities

2022 Decade Examination Update | With the connected car now commonplace in the market, automotive cybersecurity has become the vanguard of importance as it relates to road user safety. IOActive has amassed over a decade of real-world vulnerability data illustrating the issues and potential solutions to cybersecurity threats today’s vehicles face.

This analysis is a major update and follow-up to the vehicle vulnerabilities report originally published in 2016 and updated in 2018. The goal of this 2022 update is to deliver current data and discuss how the state of automotive cybersecurity has progressed over the course of 10 years, making note of overall trends and their causes.

ACCESS THE REPORT


IOACTIVE CORPORATE OVERVIEW (PDF)IOACTIVE SERVICES OVERVIEW (PDF)


IOACTIVE ARCHIVED WEBINARS